Login
part of the imperfect parent family
Minor Topics Feed
MT Web

Education


Posted November 18th, 2007 by minortopics | Permalink

Judge orders parents to vaccinate their children or go to jail

While I don’t believe parents should be forced to vaccinate their children, there has to be some sort of incentive for parents who are vaccinating their children. It is entirely unfair that parents RELY on other parents to do the right thing and create a barrier of protection for their own children. I support giving parents who vaccinate their children tax incentives.

Non-vaccinated children would probably pose a greater risk in public places like areas of transportation, where newborns could be exposed, rather than schools, however, if everybody stops vaccinating, we could have widespread disease and fatal illnesses emerge.

UPPER MARLBORO, Maryland (CNN) — A crowd of frustrated parents gathered on a chilly Saturday morning outside Prince George’s County Circuit Court to comply with an order from the school system to have their children vaccinated — or else.

Prince George’s County State’s Attorney Glenn Ivey, whose office began the effort, was at the courthouse to answer questions.

Judge C. Philip Nichols, who signed the letters threatening parents with jail or fines, said he felt the tactic worked.

“We got a thousand kids back in school just by sending one letter,” he said.

Nichols ordered parents to come to court Saturday to either immunize the children on the spot, or to provide proof that they already had their shots, according to The Associated Press.


Information from: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/17/marylan...



Comments

7 Responses
  1. Kevin
    Nov 18th, 2007
    [1] | Flag |

    I have to say - GOOD for the school district on this one. It’s about time schools and the government play hardball and stop putting OTHER children at risk because uneducated parents read some tidbit in a chain email about how vaccines can potentially, maybe, but has never been proven, harm their kids. The fact is that these vaccines have been used on a global scale to prevent disease in hundreds of millions of people. For the one bad reaction per million that happens (and even then, the reaction usually is less harmful to the child than the disease is prevents), parents need to roll that die and play the game. My view: If your kid doesn’t have proof of vaccination on the first day of school, they are not allowed to attend a single day of public school until they are vaccinated. You’re welcome to home-school your child or send them to a private school that shares your beliefs - but stop putting my kids at risk because you’re IGNORANT, you stupid homeopathic remedy pushing neo-hippie parents.

  2. mary
    Nov 18th, 2007
    [2] | Flag |

    Actually, you are the stupid parent. If my child is not vaccinated, he is the one at risk, not yours, providing yours is vaccinated

  3. shot in the dark
    Nov 18th, 2007
    [3] | Flag |

    Yes, Mary, fortunately for you a little thing called “herd immunity” gives you the luxury of practicing pseudo-science and the ability to skip vaccines with little risk. But as your “anti-vax” movement grows, one day — oops! — society will dip below the immunity threshold percentage and you will be directly culpable for re-introducing horrible diseases back into our country.

    Thanks for that.

  4. MT
    Nov 18th, 2007
    [4] | Flag |

    Herd immunity won’t necessarily protect their children. If they are around immigrants who are not vaccinated or they travel out of country, they could easily contract diseases and spread them to other non-vaccinated people. The problem is, if their child becomes a carrier, they could potentially risk the life of an infant who hasn’t yet had the opporunity to get vaccinated yet.

    Non vaccinated persons also pose a risk to premature infants, who have to get vaccinations before their little bodies are ready, in order to save themselves from non-vaccinated children and people. It’s the truth. Preemies should be the ones that should be afforded the opportunity to wait until they are of normal gestational age, but the truth is, it’s too risky. There are too many carriers out there and if a child isn’t vaccinated, and they come in contact with an immigrant coming from a country where these diseases have not been eradicated — they are going to experience the consequences of misinformation and conclusions based on junk science.

  5. DG Baird
    Nov 18th, 2007
    [5] | Flag |

    Mary, this happened in Nigeria over polio vaccinations where unfounded rumours were spread, religion/politics got involved, and parents wanted choice. One polio outbreak and few hundred paralysed kids later changed their attitudes. Even in the US kids die from preventable communicable diseases. It is the height of selfishness to deny your kids vaccinations because of your petulant attitude. I don’t want to and you cant make me so there. This is the 21st century, grow up, get your kids vaccinated and stfu.

  6. Ayden
    Feb 2nd, 2008
    [6] | Flag |

    First of all, how could your non-vaccinated child be a danger to the vaccinated child? If the vaccines are effective, then the baby should be protected. Actually, it’s the vaccinated children who spread disease. Many of the disease outbreaks that we are warned about today, are caused by, and occur in, recently vaccinated children.

    A non-vaccinated child cannot put vaccinated children at risk if the vaccines are effective. In fact, it is the vaccinated children who expose other children to increased risk. This has been confirmed again and again in outbreaks where a majority of the affected children were recently vaccinated.

    Recently vaccinated children do carry the disease germ and are able to spread it to other children. Many so-called epidemics are initiated and spread in this manner, even though the unvaccinated are blamed. On the other hand, a passive immunity to the disease may also be gained in this manner. In fact, some “authorities” argue that parents who do not vaccinate their children reap the benefits without taking the risks — a curious argument since they also argue that such parents are irresponsible by unnecessarily exposing their children to greater risk by choosing not to vaccinate.

    Parents must educate themselves prior to making a decision regarding vaccines so that they may sleep comfortably at night.

  7. Sarah
    Apr 12th, 2008
    [7] | Flag |

    This is to KEVIN, the JACKASS at the top.

    how the hell is MY kid putting YOUR damn kids at risk by not being vaccinated?!?!

    What, you think he’s walking around with measles, mumps, polio and chickenpox all in his system, just waiting to jump out and “get” YOUR kids just because he’s not vaccinated?!

    What a jackass. I can’t believe there’s people that stupid and uninformed actually walking around among us. Scary.

7 Responses
Leave a reply

Comment Preview
Active Education Discussions
Substitute teacher fired for "wizardry"1 comment
Waukegan teacher charged with smoking pot in lounge1 comment
Teacher give details of student attack1 comment
Teacher suspended for passing cigarette around to students1 comment
Student fails assignment because of religious references2 comments
Student pees in lunch box, hands it to teacher1 comment
HOAX: Girl beat up over anti illegal immigration poster 4 comments
Student claims teacher called him a terrorist3 comments
Expelled high school student sues school2 comments
Teacher doesn't give bathroom breaks1 comment
Help us find the latest parenting related news. Become a Minor Topics Editor today.
Advertisement
Recent Education News
Teen suspended for pot brownies
Substitute teacher arrested for being dr...
Teen suspended for refusing to stand dur...
Waukegan teacher charged with smoking po...
Substitute teacher fired for "wizardry"
Lacrosse players send bare butt prom inv...
Teen allowed to bring older boyfriend to...
Teacher suspended for passing cigarette ...
"Shamed teacher" can go back to work
Seattle teacher refuses to give standard...
» Read more Education news