The presidential contender says we should look into “clean coal,” but she can’t promise she would never support “dirty” energy.
Full Story: http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/0...Filed under: News & Politics
So she supports “clean coal”, but not nuclear, which is cleaner than coal could ever be? Seems like she hasn’t done her “research” as well as the article implies — or, more likely, she has and knows that nuclear is a tough sell to her base.
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website