 |
||
A look at Bill O'Reilly's new book, Kids Are Americans Too |
||
| October 23, 2007
|
||
|
- Bill O'Reilly, Kids Are Americans Too Bill O'Reilly -- host of The O'Reilly Factor on the Fox News Channel -- has written a new book for kids all about the basic workings of the US government and how the authority of parents and schools affect kids' rights. Kids Are Americans Too is full of real-life examples that relate back to situations that kids might encounter themselves, from the ideals of the Founding Fathers to the role of the judicial system to decisions made by parents and teachers that were fought -- and sometimes overturned -- by kids. O'Reilly's tone, while more objective than I expected it to be, varies between authoritarian (How many kids do you know that like to be called "kid"? I never did), sarcastic (I think Britney Spears and Paris Hilton are ridiculous too, but snarking on them doesn't bolster O'Reilly's message), and embarrassing (His original "raps" made me cringe. I can only imagine how a teen would react). He does have paragraphs of lucidity -- even poking fun at himself now and then (which is probably more entertaining for his adult readers than kids) -- but he invariably missteps as noted, which only serves to dilute the point he's trying to make. O'Reilly concludes that the mother in this story was protecting her child from harm "by overseeing her daughter's ties with an obvious criminal." It only became obvious once she picked up the phone; such a description is misleading. And again, if the mother already didn't trust this boy, why did she allow her daughter to maintain ties with him all along? Plainly, it's not as easy as O'Reilly makes it out to be. Another example is the story of a high school literary magazine function that took place outside New York City. To make an inordinately long story short, three girls were suspended (and then the suspension was reversed) for using the word "vagina" on stage -- because school officials stated that the girls had promised beforehand not to do so. The girls insisted that they never made such a promise. O'Reilly described the events that transpired after the function, maintaining a calm and objective tone throughout. So I was quite surprised when I read his conclusions: ...if it's true that the girls did promise in advance not to say the word, then [by not punishing the girls, the superintendent] sent a very bad message to all students in the district: It's okay to be deceitful.What? In one paragraph, O'Reilly writes "If (emphasis mine) it's true that the girls did promise in advance not to say the word..." In the very next paragraph, O'Reilly not only describes the girls as "mouthy", but concludes that they shouldn't "be allowed to get away with falsifying their story." Which is it? Did the girls lie or didn't they? And does O'Reilly adequately support his opinion (clearly, that the girls lied) on this point? If I read this book as a teen -- mind you, one who was a lot more respectful of authority than O'Reilly himself, based on his personal youthful description in the book -- I would have been confused and intimidated. Basically, the message he's giving is that if those in charge agree with you, you're a good kid -- and a good American. But if they don't, you're open to harsh judgment and criticism simply because they don't agree with you. I wouldn't find this book reassuring or educational at all. And that's what I find most regretful. A book like this one should inspire kids to think about situations, analyze others' behavior and decisions, consider how they would act under similar circumstances. Perhaps they might act in a way that Bill O'Reilly finds objectionable; that doesn't necessarily make them wrong. I'm working hard to raise my girls to think for themselves, not to parrot what I might say or do under every circumstance. Yes, I'm the adult, and it's my responsibility to guide them, and it's their responsibility to listen. But do I have all the answers? No, and I shouldn't act as if I do either. That's a recipe for disappointment on all our parts. Instead, I want them to think and analyze and consider, without fear of whether I will necessarily agree with them. Perhaps they'll be able to defend their position; perhaps not. Regardless, I'll be proud of them for having staked one out. Stay even more informed about politics and parenting issues by visiting our Parental is Political resources. |
||
| ||
1 Response to "A look at Bill O'Reilly's new book, Kids Are Americans Too"Leave a comment: | ||
| ||
| ||
IMPERFECTION IN YOUR INBOX
 | ||
 | ||
| ||
POPULAR RIGHT NOW
Coffee or Tea, Which One is for Me? When I registered as an Independent, I did so because... read more » The Ides and Crooked Teeth of March According to the old saying, the month of March usually... read more » Why I'm tired of the GOP There's no doubt (except perhaps among loyal listeners... read more » |
About The Imperfect Parent | Submission Guidelines | Press | Contact Us | Advertise on The Imperfect Parent | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
All original content © 2002 - 2010 The Imperfect Parent™ and Tiny Tantrums Media. The Imperfect Parent and Mominatrix are trademarks of Prudentia Communications Group.
The views, opinions and information expressed in articles and blog posts published on imperfectparent.com and all subdomains are those of the authors alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of The Imperfect Parent or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of any entity of, or affiliated with, The Imperfect Parent and Prudentia Communications Group. The Imperfect Parent is designed for entertainment purposes only and is not meant to be a substitute for medical, health, legal, or financial advice from a professional.
Reproduction of material from any of The Imperfect Parent's pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. The Imperfect Parent and Tiny Tantrums are trademarks of Prudentia Communications Group.
1. ibc
Oct 23, 2007 14:44
You just can not understand Bill O'Reilly without watching at least a dozen episodes of The Colbert Report. It really is like a Rosetta Stone that opens the mysteries of artifacts like "Kids Are Americans..." and "The Factor".Subjecting O'Reilly to a rational critique is like subjecting a vintage Jerry Lewis film to a Jennifer Hommans review.