Share your knowledge and make money doing it -- become an Imperfect Parent Tipster today! Apply here
Subscribe to our feedFollow us on TwitterFind us on Facebook
Read more: blogher, john edwards, elizabeth edwards, parental is political

Home -> Columnists -> The Parental is Political

The Parental is Political

Thoughts on Elizabeth Edwards at BlogHer 2007

By Julie Marsh

July 31, 2007


Last year after the closing keynote address at the BlogHer conference -- at which Arianna Huffington was one of the speakers -- a close friend of mine asked if it bothered me to be politically distant from so many of my fellow conference attendees. I had enjoyed the keynote. It focused on issues that, for the most part and to varying degrees, were of interest to all women. And despite the party indicated on my voter registration card, the issues that interested me weren't all that divergent from those of the other attendees.

This year was a different story.

Elizabeth Edwards was the closing keynote speaker at this year's conference. She may be the wife of Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but she is also an individual in her own right, and I looked forward to hearing what she -- and she alone -- had to say about various issues.

The discussion started off just as I had hoped. She took questions that were not at all partisan in and of themselves, and I appreciated hearing her views. Granted, I wasn't in complete agreement with all of her stated views, but it was enlightening to see where we shared common thoughts -- such as on the value of child care. And I liked that she was willing to speak to her own beliefs, not just those of the campaign, as she asserted that, "I try to answer the question that's asked of me."

However, the discussion soon shifted to topics specific to the 2008 campaign, and in turn Mrs. Edwards' responses grew less personal and more focused on John Edwards' campaign stances and how his positions differ from those of the other Democratic candidates. I was disappointed by what I saw as veiled campaigning on her part. I wanted to hear her thoughts on particular issues and her suggestions as to what we as individuals could do to make our voices heard, not why she thought her husband would be the best candidate to lead our country.

I was especially surprised by her statement that, "Probably most of the women in this room believe all the same things (that she and Hillary Clinton do)." While I'm sure Mrs. Edwards is accustomed to speaking to groups of Democrats, and I recognize that many women bloggers are generally liberal, I still felt somewhat alienated by her assertion and I appreciated Lisa Stone's follow-on point that great political diversity exists among the BlogHer membership.



But my disappointment peaked when she never did manage to answer Lisa's question as to whether she reads blogs written from differing viewpoints and what her top three blogs were. Considering that she stated, both before and after that question, that she simply answered the questions that were asked of her, I was bothered that she didn't do so in that case. Even if she didn't want to name sites, regardless of their political bent, I wish she would have said so. But by avoiding the question entirely, it led me to conclude that she doesn't in fact read any conservative blogs.

So naturally I was pleased when Kathryn of Daring Young Mom spoke up as a conservative -- a segment which is curiously missing from the final video blog post of this discussion on the BlogHer site. While I expect that Kathryn's political views and mine diverge in many areas, I wasn't looking to her to speak for me or the party on our voter registration cards, but simply to call attention to the assumptions that had been made during the discussion.

Over the more than two years that I've been blogging, time and time again I've seen how often bloggers' views converge, despite what their voter registration cards might say. We share so many commonalities -- particularly among those of us who are parents -- that politicians (and their spouses) don't see. I believe they are blinded to these individual commonalities because they are focused on highlighting the differences between the parties and assume that all people who call themselves a Democrat or a Republican believe the same things. It's not true.

If politicians (and their spouses) want to reach out effectively to voters, I think a better approach would be to simply ask where voters' priorities lie, what issues are most important to them, and how they'd like to see them addressed. It's not up to politicians to provide us with solutions. It's up to all of us to determine where we'd like to go and how we'd like to get there, and then work with our representatives -- from local government all the way up to the federal government -- to help make it happen.





Stay even more informed about politics and parenting issues by visiting our Parental is Political resources.

Julie is a former Air Force officer and professional project manager turned web writer. She spent four years at the Pentagon and five years in New York City, and her suburban life in Colorado seems pastoral by comparison. She's no political pundit, but she is an objective thinker in a sea of partisan propagandists. She writes for The Mom Slant, Cool Mom Picks, and is co-founder of The Parent Bloggers Network.

4 Responses to "Thoughts on Elizabeth Edwards at BlogHer 2007 "

1. LawyerMama

Jul 31, 2007 14:19

Julie - Great article. Although I am a liberal, I also noticed some left leaning tendencies throughout the entire conference, not just Ms. Edwards' talk. There seemed to be an assumption that all the bloggers at BlogHer were liberals. Maybe I notice it because my husband is a conservative. I tend to review, not only my thoughts, but also what my husband would say in response to an argument or comment.

I didn't, however, take Elizabeth Edwards' comment that she believed most of the women there thought the same things as an insistence that we were all homogeneous in our viewpoints. I believe at the time she was talking about HRC and women's issues. EE made the statement to the effect that she believed women should support women's issues and I thought *that* was what she was referring to with her comment about all of the attendees probably thinking the same thing.

I haven't reviewed the video though, so I may be remembering it incorrectly.

2. Susan Getgood

Jul 31, 2007 15:02

While I think to some degree part of what sounded like campaigning, and too much John Edwards, not enough Elizabeth, was driven by the fact that she has to differentiate her opinions from his, you are getting at what I think is the fundamental political issue we face -- that increasing polarization of politics (call it red/blue if you must) is making it next to impossible to focus on the actual issues.

I think we have to accept that there are some issues that are not negotiable, whether for profound personal or religious reasons, and people are highly unlikely to change their minds. But why is this preventing us collectively as a nation from coming together and discussing those important issues where we might be able to find common ground?

Instead we have sound bites and cult of personality and ad hominem attacks. Not discourse.

This, more than anything else, is what scares me about the future of our country.

3. Julie

Aug 01, 2007 10:03

Thanks for your comments.

Lawyer Mama, that's exactly the context of the quote from my personal site - I described the context there too, lest it appear that I took it out of context.

Specifically, she was speaking to how her position (and JE's) on DOMA differ slightly from HRC's, but that generally speaking, she and HRC "believe all the same things". Then she went on to make the statement I quoted. While I would hope that her intent was as you describe (and as other commenters on my site have said as well), I still think it could have been framed in a more inclusive manner - that is, not as a follow-on statement to how she and HRC are similar.

Susan, I honestly didn't mind hearing how EE's views differ from JE's views. In fact, that added to her appeal in my mind - she is an individual in her own right, and I was pleased to hear her thoughts. What I didn't care for was how she differentiated between the Democratic candidates views on more than one occasion. At BlogHer, I don't want to know why JE's stances are preferable to those of the other Dems - I want to know what EE thinks about issues that concern women, whether or not we may agree in our views.

And as I said on my site, I don't think we're nearly as boxed in to the red/blue definitions as candidates would have us believe. I didn't speak to this in either post, but I also was somewhat puzzled by the "team" analogy that EE used. If I'm not a Dem, am I not on her "team"? Are we automatically opponents? I don't see it that way.

But I certainly agree with your standpoint on sound bites - makes it difficult for anyone, politician or otherwise, to speak plainly. I do hope that none of what I've said here is perceived as an attack - I'm merely questioning the views EE expressed and her motivations for doing so.

4. Angela

Aug 01, 2007 10:57

Great article. Thanks for being honest and upfront about your politics and pointing out that as parents we have so much more in common than not.

Leave a comment:

Comments are automatically filtered and may not be posted immediately in an effort to remove commercial messages, irrelevancies, excessive foul language and/or personal attacks and will be edited/deleted at our discretion.
*Name:
*Email (not displayed):
URL:
*Comments: Word limit 1000 words. HTML tags are not allowed.
*Please enter the 2 words (this helps us reduce spam):
  

More Columnists:

Long Journey on a Short Bus
The Club.
By Karen Murphy

Not Your Average Fairy Tale
The Ghosts of Halloweens Past
By Melissa Doak

Silence is Not an Option
The Judas Kiss
By Robert Green

The View From Here
Are you a Promo-Mom?
By Amy Sue Nathan

While Mom's @ Work
So I Answered an Axe Murderer
By Chag Holland

Related Articles:

The Parental is Political
Who's Who Among Presidential Candidates: Ron Paul
By Julie Marsh

The Parental is Political
Flag burning: merely incendiary, or downright illegal?
By Julie Marsh

Mother Magnetism
BlogHer '07 - Beauty & Style Wrapup
By Kelly Reising

The Parental is Political
Friends and Politics
By Julie Marsh

The Parental is Political
Do Endorsements Matter?
By Julie Marsh

Google
The Imperfect Parent Web

Home -> Columnists -> The Parental is Political

Share your knowledge and make money doing it. Become an Imperfect Parent Tipster.
IMPERFECTION IN YOUR INBOX



Find your online degree



Our supporters:
Advertisement
POPULAR RIGHT NOW
 

"We all suffer from the preoccupation that there exists... in the loved one, perfection." -- Sidney Poitier