![]() |
||
Facing new political responsibilities as a parent. |
||
| February 6, 2007
|
||
|
What do I know about politics? Certainly not as much as I used to, back in the days when I was free to watch “Meet The Press” on Sunday mornings. Now my girls clamor for cartoons instead. Perhaps if NBC were to animate Tim Russert and his guests…now there’s an idea! It seems that many parents – especially mothers – aren’t nearly as politically informed as they once were. Understandably so -- our priorities have shifted from reading the newspaper to reading Goodnight Moon. Parents who work at least get a chance to read the paper on the train or surf CNN on their lunch hour. Parents who stay home – well, we’re lucky if we get a chance to go to the bathroom alone. Keeping up with current events is next to impossible with a toddler tugging at your sleeve. But when election talk starts up, it’s important to be clear on where candidates stand on the issues and how well their views match up with your own – which means that you ought to be informed on the issues yourself. Easier said than done, I know. In last Sunday’s Washington Post, an article by Linda Hirshman helped solidify my focus for this column. She hypothesized that elections don’t turn on female voters because we “vote on impulse, and on elusive factors such as personality.” Specifically, she spoke to several women – educated former executives who now stay at home – about how they obtain their political information. Aside from listening to talk radio in the car, they rely on their husbands to keep them up to date. James Carville and Mary Matalin may be an extreme example, but I think they illustrate well the fact that husbands and wives aren't always of the same mind politically. Shouldn’t mothers (and fathers) take responsibility for gathering information and forming their own opinions? Absolutely, and I expect most women – and most men – would agree. Unfortunately, I would postulate that the reason we don’t do so is that all of those issues seem so distant and irrelevant to us. The war in Iraq is half a world away. Environmental change takes place so slowly that it’s difficult to notice. Estate taxes won’t affect us for many years (we hope). And we’ve been saying the Pledge of Allegiance for so many years we don’t even notice that “under God” part anymore. Until your son wants to join the Marines and comes home with enlistment papers. Or your newborn baby is diagnosed with a rare genetic disease and will require expensive regular treatment for the rest of her life. Or you announce that you’re pregnant and your boss says he’ll have to let you go. Or your parents die and in order to settle their estate, you actually owe taxes. Those seemingly irrelevant issues can hit home when you least expect it. There’s a lot of excitement in the media concerning the prospective candidates in next year’s presidential elections, not to mention all of the other congressional, state, and local elections that will take place. There’s also a lot to learn, about both the candidates and the issues. Where do they stand, and more importantly, where do you stand? Don’t let your votes be determined by the personalities – or even merely the political parties – of the candidates. In this column, I’ll tackle the various issues and policies on the national and global levels. My intent is not to tell you what you should think, but to provide a digest of the vast amounts of information available, summarize the key points, and point you toward more comprehensive sources – factual sources, not op-ed sites – for the details. With the birth of our children came many new responsibilities. We were not absolved of the responsibility to educate ourselves politically. If anything, it’s more important now than ever to have a clear understanding of our world so that we may vote accordingly. The parental most certainly is the political. Stay even more informed about politics and parenting issues by visiting our Parental is Political resources. |
||
| ||
8 Responses to "Facing new political responsibilities as a parent."Leave a comment: | ||
| ||
| ||
IMPERFECTION IN YOUR INBOX
| ||
| ||
POPULAR RIGHT NOW
Coffee or Tea, Which One is for Me? When I registered as an Independent, I did so because... read more » The Ides and Crooked Teeth of March According to the old saying, the month of March usually... read more » Why I'm tired of the GOP There's no doubt (except perhaps among loyal listeners... read more » |
1. Angela
Feb 06, 2007 13:28

I really enjoy your blog and am looking forward to reading this column.I am curious about the subtitle of your column referring to both politics and religion. While I know that religion strongly influence politics in our country (depending on who you are it is too much or too little), I wonder why religion itself is included under the title Parenting is Political. I may be misunderstanding the title or just thinking too much.
2. prescott
Feb 06, 2007 15:22

Since I'm the one that added the tag line to Julie's column index page, I thought I would respond...Angela, I think you answered your own question. Many people's views on religion and social issues strongly influences their vote -- an ultra-conservative and religious former co-worker of mine told me he would vote for a Democrat if they promised to abolish Roe v. Wade -- so I think those subjects clearly fall under the theme of this column.
3. Her Bad Mother
Feb 06, 2007 19:04

What a wonderful concept for a column - and awesomely done, right out of the gate. But I wouldn't expect anything else from you, Julie.4. PunditMom
Feb 06, 2007 22:28

This will be a great column! I am right on that page, too!5. mom101
Feb 06, 2007 23:44

Funny enough, when I think of Americans who vote on impulse and personality, the first person who pops to mind isn't a mom or a woman at all - it's the Nascar guy from the last election who essentially said, "well I don't know much about no politics, but that George Bush sure seems like a guy I could have a beer with."Looking forward to future columns, Julie!
6. Kathleen Hudson
Feb 09, 2007 23:55

I'm happy to see this article and will follow it closely. Although I find it hard to keep up with current events and often fall behind, I actually feel more of a responsibility to participate in the political process now that I'm a mother than I ever did before. My husband and I have taken our kids to a number of political rallies, and we schlepped our oldest son with us in his stroller to canvass for Kerry in 2004. My husband and I agree on a lot of political issues, but certainly not all, and we enjoy discussing politics.Linda Hirshman makes my blood boil, not because I think her conclusions are 100% wrong (I don't), but because she's so smug in HER belief that they're 100% right and can be applied uniformly to every woman (at least the mostly white, highly educated, upper-middle class women with whom she's primarily concerned). Her article in the Post stirred up some discussion on the D.C. Urban Moms listserv, and one person noted that what Hirshman said about SAHMs is true of Americans across the board. Many of our fellow citizens are woefully underinformed, we have a short attention span for complex issues, we substitute others' judgment for our own, and we vote on impulse. Not a ground-breaking discovery. I would guess that highly educated women may be less prone to these tendencies than the average American. But what do I know, I wipe behinds all day.
7. Nancy
Feb 16, 2007 20:15

Thanks for letting me know about your column, Julie. I am really looking forward to learning from you -- I still consider myself a "newbie" in the politics arena, but I'm enjoying the process of getting educated.8. PunditMom
Feb 17, 2007 14:21

Hear, hear, Julie. Voting on impulse? I'm sure it happens, but not in my universe. I worry about what Linda Hirshman's antics will do to those of us who take our politics seriously.