|
|
| Author |
Message |
TreeMom Slightly Flawed
Joined: 09 Jan 2007 Posts: 109
|
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:36 pm Post subject: CA Bill Could Ban Spanking for Children under 3 |
|
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/21/us/21spank.html
Sorry to do a drive by. Wanted to hear some intelligent thoughts on this. Will be back in later this week when life isn't crazy
Kelly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DietCokeHead Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 29 Apr 2002 Posts: 3805
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
LMAO about this bill. It will never pass.
Sorry, I know that's not the intelligent comment you are looking for but that's all I've got. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jessica Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 20 Apr 2002 Posts: 4762 Location: Chi-town
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was going to blog about this, but I waited too long.
I think it's a further erosion of our rights and I think it's totally scary. Much scarier than spanking itself.
I know some people would love it if our government were like that of a communist state, where the state controlled every aspect of our lives, but that is so fucking un-American.
People need to stand up against this kind of invasions of privacy. The government only need get involved in questions of abuse, not judicially used parenting methods. The next ban by this movement will be infant formula, it's already been taken up by a Senator. <shudder> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scout Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 20 Dec 2002 Posts: 3390 Location: home of the blues
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't see how a law protecting babies from getting hit is in any way like a bill to outlaw formula. I see no problem with it. I think children need to be protected, and I don't really care if some people think it violates a right they do not have to hit their toddler. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jessica Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 20 Apr 2002 Posts: 4762 Location: Chi-town
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Scout wrote: |
| I think children need to be protected, and I don't really care if some people think it violates a right they do not have to hit their toddler. |
Actually, it is a right parents have. Parents currently have the right to swat their kids on the behind.
You are not my child's mother, and I oppose your personal opinions being legislated so that you can raise everybody elses kids or decide how everybody should raise their kids. That's exactly why it's such a scary bill and exactly why I think it brings us that much closer to accepting bans on formula or what kind of car you can use to cart your kids around.
I swear, these nanny state ideals you wish to impose will only bite you in the ass. Suppose a lawmaker wants to ban BFIP? Suppose they say it's emotionally damaging to kids to see that. I don't think so, but it straddles such a precarious line. Or better yet, the example of sleeping with your baby, what if a lawmaker wanted to make that illegal. There's definitely supporting evidence that that is dangerous. Let's just say we make that illegal too?
Child abuse is already illegal, so I'll cut you off at the chase.
This is a dangerous, dangerous bill -- even more dangerous than a few swats on the butt. Kristy, you might think it's dandy because it aligns with your parenting methods, but what if it was something that didn't. Now, you have created a situation where your voice doesn't count, it's the government that decides how you raise your kids.
I don't know about you, but I actually think I am more competent as a parent than the government is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Petulant Pixie Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 4140 Location: flyover country
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I don't agree with it either. I'm not in favor of spanking. I *have* spanked, but I don't agree with it as a go-to discipline method. But, I also am in full support of parents being in control of their child-rearing methods, except for in cases of abuse.
I also think there are so many cases of actual neglect and abuse that are going un-checked that putting this much effort into the spanking thing is ridiculous.
Aside from charging parents with a crime, what else is being done to give parents effective discipline tools? Are ALL parents going to be given free positive parenting classes? Are parents going to be offered support groups where they can brainstorm on specific behavioral issues and learn different techniques to handle these issues? Are Supernanny and Keith Ablow going to be available for housecalls or to talk parents through situations via a 24 hour hotline? Is the government going to pay for that? The idea of not spanking goes a lot further than simply not spanking. The kid's behavior still needs to be re-directed somehow and parents who use spanking as thier regular tool do so because they don't know what else to do. So, what IS to be done about that?
I'd rather see all of the above done first and then come back to this issue a few years down the road and see if spanking is still happening. Then address it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jessica Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 20 Apr 2002 Posts: 4762 Location: Chi-town
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Petulant Pixie wrote: |
I'd rather see all of the above done first and then come back to this issue a few years down the road and see if spanking is still happening. Then address it. |
Yeah, but the problem is this: is swatting a kid on the butt abusive? Let me pre-qualify my position, I have never spanked Graham because he is a different kid and that wasn't going to work. He would never be able to process it as an attention getter. Holden always had a great deal of focus issues, so when were in the city and I would tell him not to run in front of me, it went in one ear and out the other. We would do time-outs when appropriate, but if it was a question of danger, like running out onto Chicago traffic while I bent down to pick up my car keys, taking him inside and swatting him on the butt was a way to get his attention quickly and he didn't respond to anything else. I made the decision that his life was more important than a swat on the butt.
Plus, the thing is, spanking in and of itself is really not abusive, anybody doing it to the point where they severely hurt the child -- leave belt marks or injuries, there are already laws in place that aren't even being attended to adequately or efficiently. Do you even know how many stories I get in my Google alerts where an infant/toddler/child was killed by a family member after being checked up on by police or a social worker and "okay-ed"?? It's not that they spanked the child, it's that they bludgeoned them to death or threw them down the stairs. A spanking law is not going to address these issues.
(Total tangential rant, but relevant for me: Furthermore, and I hate to bring politics into it, but it just seems like such hypocrisy from the left, trying to mandate parenting choices, yet celebrating abortion and advocating for child predators and killers, mental illness or not. So...we're (generally speaking) going to throw a good parent in jail for swatting a toddler on the butt, yet champion someone like Andrea Yates and support the ACLU in their plight to allow pedophiles to work and play with small children and their wanting to sexualize children. That's why I will never vote for a lib. Ever. I will never understand that hypocrisy. Never, ever, ever.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
snuffles Slightly Flawed
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Posts: 57 Location: Great Pacific Northwest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I stand firmly in your corner Jessica! Good for you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mammaX3_MOD Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 Posts: 574 Location: western WA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| (Total tangential rant, but relevant for me: Furthermore, and I hate to bring politics into it, but it just seems like such hypocrisy from the left, trying to mandate parenting choices, yet celebrating abortion and advocating for child predators and killers, mental illness or not. So...we're (generally speaking) going to throw a good parent in jail for swatting a toddler on the butt, yet champion someone like Andrea Yates and support the ACLU in their plight to allow pedophiles to work and play with small children and their wanting to sexualize children. That's why I will never vote for a lib. Ever. I will never understand that hypocrisy. Never, ever, ever.) |
Once again Jessica, you took the words right out of my mouth leaving me with nothing to say but "Right on!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Petulant Pixie Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 4140 Location: flyover country
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, spanking in itself is not abusive. But, it isn't great parenting either. Spankers use spanking when either they don't know what other tools to use or they're too lazy to use other tools or they're angry. Spanking can *always* be replaced by some other disciplinary tool.
That said, as I've said, I have spanked. I can go on and on justifying why I *chose* to spank in specific situations, but that's really beside the point.
It is true that parents who use spanking--most of them, not ALL, but most of them--use spanking as their knee-jerk disciplinary tool, which means they spank for everything. Also, it is true that spankings increase in number and intensity over time, so when a parent starts out with 1 or 2 swats for something, it can lead to 5 or 6 swats for something real small in a real short period of time. There have been tons of studies done on spanking and the pros and cons of it. Those are two absolute truths, and those two thing can *lead* to abuse. Hitting more frequently and harder and for many many issues can lead to a generally violent uprbinging, which really can be abusive.
So, I would totally advocate funding for positive parenting classes and support groups and hotlines with behaviorists to answer calls and give disciplinary advice. I bet with that kind of support, then the occurrance of spanking would go way down and there wouldn't need to be any laws discouraging it.
The irony of this of course, is that spanking is punishment. One of the reasons it isn't an effective disciplinary tool is that it works only because the spankee is afraid of the spanker. Spanking (in most cases) teaches nothing, it only enforces discipline with the "right by might" rule. Charging people with a crime for spanking rather than teaching them other skills is doing exactly the same thing. It isn't teaching them anything, it's simply using a "right by might" mentality as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Petulant Pixie Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 4140 Location: flyover country
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| OK, if I'm going to participate in this discussion, then I could really do without the left vs right bullshit and the cheering sections. The "yay you" stuff is really juvenile and irritating. If you have something to contribute, then do so, but the rah-rah anti-liberal stuff is a serious turn off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jessica Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 20 Apr 2002 Posts: 4762 Location: Chi-town
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Petulant Pixie wrote: |
| OK, if I'm going to participate in this discussion, then I could really do without the left vs right bullshit and the cheering sections. The "yay you" stuff is really juvenile and irritating. If you have something to contribute, then do so, but the rah-rah anti-liberal stuff is a serious turn off. |
I only brought politics into because it's a fundamental turning point for *me*. It's a personal thing that defines my personal politics and banning spanking only further errodes our rightsd and doesn't address real child abuse (the people that cook their babies in microwaves aren't really going to be swayed by a no-spanking law) and it will probably wind up hurting and punishing some parents that use it judicially and are fine parents aside from one's own personal parenting methods.
It's a scary prospect for me and I will vote accordingly.
PP, I agree with much you have said and I don't think we're that far off on this issue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Petulant Pixie Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 4140 Location: flyover country
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think we're disagreeing on this either, which is why the whole anti-liberal thing is so distasteful and sadly, that's what's getting the cheers, not any real discussion about the idea of outlawing spanking.
I totally don't see this as a liberal/conservative thing anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TreeMom Slightly Flawed
Joined: 09 Jan 2007 Posts: 109
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm...My formerly Liberal-turned-more-conservative every day husband and me with my unfortunate Libertarian-phase turned one eyebrow short of a socialist don't spank and have always thought hitting a child under three constitutes if not abuse, something very akin to it. We have spanned about every side of right and left between the two of us. I can't imagine this is a political issue aside from the fact that its a proposed bill. What you define as abuse or something akin to it isn't political.
Now, do I think that spanking is good parenting? Nope I do not. But I often resort to things I think are not-good-parenting as well. I think it has some negative effect on kids, but not abuse.
However I can't ever see hitting a child under 3 as anything but so very bad. I think the proposed sentences are appropriate.
And Jessica - While I appreciate that I am not a parent to your kid or vice versa I also think that a right of a child supersedes made up rights of parents. I wish more adults would have been willing to strip my parents of some rights.
I also agree I don't think the bill will pass.
Kelly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jessica Queen of Imperfection
Joined: 20 Apr 2002 Posts: 4762 Location: Chi-town
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TreeMom wrote: |
And Jessica - While I appreciate that I am not a parent to your kid or vice versa I also think that a right of a child supersedes made up rights of parents. I wish more adults would have been willing to strip my parents of some rights. |
...and with that said, I pray to God you never are able to make that decision for me and I hope Americans seeking the right to parent they way they want will stand up to people who feel the way you do.
I would be thrown in jail if you had your druthers, all although I'm an imperfect parent, the thought of that is so scary, I really think people need to rally together to make sure this kind of Nanny state does not take hold of our right altogether.
I am a huge children's rights advocate, yet call me crazy, but I think addressing those who really are abusing kids (I have never heard of someone swatting a toddler on the butt, as I have, being a crime) would be a priority. It scares me that as you put it Treemom, you want to push socialist (although this is more dictator-like-restrictions on people.)
That's why it is political. I don't want to live in socialistic or communist society. I think it's safe to say that most people in America don't.
Plus, the funny thing is, all of you that think that people like me should be thrown in jail, you're all so mellow-dramatic about a swat on the butt until legislation is passed to impose on some of your parenting methods that you think are all peachy-keen but others don't (ie; infant co-sleeping).
American's need to step up and stop this. Stop other parents from making decisions for you!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
Advertisement
| Sign up for Imperfect Parent News |
|
 |
|